No matter the application scenario, ofa.js is suitable.
I'm too old to learn, I don't want to read your docs, can it be used?
No need to learn ofa.js first, you can directly reuse components built on it.
After the open-source component author finishes writing the code, others just need to copy a few lines from the example and instantly bring the functionality into their own project.
I want to temporarily add a feature to an old project
Simply introduce ofa.js into your existing project via a script tag, and it's ready to use immediately.
After introducing it, a variety of components are readily available.
I'm a beginner developer, Node.js and npm turned me away
ofa.js is very beginner-friendly; you don't need to learn tools like Node.js or npm.
You only need a browser and any static server to start developing.
If you use Chrome, open OFA Studio this online tool, and you won't need to prepare a static server; just start.
Tutorial: Create your first app
Developing a huge shopping mall system, can you support it?
ofa.js is very suitable for large projects because it adopts a micro-frontend architecture pattern.
You can break down the mall system into sufficiently granular requirements, develop components one by one, put them in separate folders, and preview component effects directly through a static server.
Finally, assemble them into a huge system. ofa.js 's micro-frontend pattern is exactly the remedy for monolithic applications.
For reference, check out the case NoneOS, an operating system developed with ofa.js, which is very large in scale.
I'm a backend developer, I just want to use a backend template engine to develop, is ofa.js suitable?
ofa.js's SSR does not need to be bound to Node.js. As long as you follow the SCSR rules, you can use any backend language for template engine development.
For details, refer to ofa.js SSR